<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hi-Teknology 3: Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/</link>
	<description>The Underground Hip Hop Authority &#124; Hip Hop Music, Videos &#38; Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Yeah, definitely disappointing, but I wouldn&#039;t necessarily say garbage.  There&#039;s plenty of other &quot;crap hop&quot; out now that I would label as garbage, though.  I think Hi-Tek lost focus with this one though.  Some of the beats were definitely there... My Piano, God&#039;s Plan, Time.  Overall, I think he picked the wrong underground acts to work with.  There are some much better MC&#039;s on MySpace than some of the cats he chose for this project.  That, plus I think a lot of the beats were mainstream influenced.  I liked the versatility in his beats; how he switched up the style, but some were just repetitious and mimicked a lot of the crap you hear on radio today.  That&#039;s just my 2 cents... Thanks for voicing your opinion, George!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, definitely disappointing, but I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily say garbage.  There&#8217;s plenty of other &#8220;crap hop&#8221; out now that I would label as garbage, though.  I think Hi-Tek lost focus with this one though.  Some of the beats were definitely there&#8230; My Piano, God&#8217;s Plan, Time.  Overall, I think he picked the wrong underground acts to work with.  There are some much better MC&#8217;s on MySpace than some of the cats he chose for this project.  That, plus I think a lot of the beats were mainstream influenced.  I liked the versatility in his beats; how he switched up the style, but some were just repetitious and mimicked a lot of the crap you hear on radio today.  That&#8217;s just my 2 cents&#8230; Thanks for voicing your opinion, George!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 04:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>my man, i thought this whole CD was garbage. i didn&#039;t like anything about except for My Piano and thats because you can never go wrong with Ghost and Raek. i guess i was just expecting too much from Tek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my man, i thought this whole CD was garbage. i didn&#8217;t like anything about except for My Piano and thats because you can never go wrong with Ghost and Raek. i guess i was just expecting too much from Tek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Trap -- haha, you still mad off Edwin&#039;s review of &#039;Big Doe&#039; huh?  Just to back up my review, first of all, Edwin and I have different review styles.  He seems to review albums as a whole, whereas I like to break it down track by track.  What I do is I rate each track and then figure out the average and that&#039;s how I come up with my overall album rating.  I too was a little surprised at how high the rating on this one came out.  Maybe I wasn&#039;t as harsh as I could have been on the weaker tracks.  But I think Hi-Tek is talented and he&#039;s got some good beats on here.  Anyway, thanks for keeping me in check, but I still stand by review.  Maybe I need to rethink my rating system though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trap &#8212; haha, you still mad off Edwin&#8217;s review of &#8216;Big Doe&#8217; huh?  Just to back up my review, first of all, Edwin and I have different review styles.  He seems to review albums as a whole, whereas I like to break it down track by track.  What I do is I rate each track and then figure out the average and that&#8217;s how I come up with my overall album rating.  I too was a little surprised at how high the rating on this one came out.  Maybe I wasn&#8217;t as harsh as I could have been on the weaker tracks.  But I think Hi-Tek is talented and he&#8217;s got some good beats on here.  Anyway, thanks for keeping me in check, but I still stand by review.  Maybe I need to rethink my rating system though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trapperjohnmd</title>
		<link>http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Trapperjohnmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Kevin, My Man, it&#039;s no way in the world this gets the same rating as Ghost. I&#039;m kinda dissapointed in the CD myself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, My Man, it&#8217;s no way in the world this gets the same rating as Ghost. I&#8217;m kinda dissapointed in the CD myself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Mrklimatic -- yeah, I totally agree with you about Hi-Tek and the Hi-Teknology series.  Still better than a lot of other producers out now though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mrklimatic &#8212; yeah, I totally agree with you about Hi-Tek and the Hi-Teknology series.  Still better than a lot of other producers out now though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrklimatic</title>
		<link>http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrklimatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-404</guid>
		<description>The only difference on this version of &quot;Step It Up&quot; would be Dion singing a little bit more after the first hook, but other than that it is pretty much the same song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only difference on this version of &#8220;Step It Up&#8221; would be Dion singing a little bit more after the first hook, but other than that it is pretty much the same song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrklimatic</title>
		<link>http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrklimatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinnottingham.com/2007/12/06/hi-teknology-3-review/#comment-403</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with the overall rating.  I still to this day believe that Hi-Teknology 1 is the best out of the three.  The others are good but Hi-Tek was DJ Hi-Tek on that first joint as opposed to being Dre pupil with a hint of Hi-Tek on the side on the other two projects.  Regardless the man is still a beast on the beats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the overall rating.  I still to this day believe that Hi-Teknology 1 is the best out of the three.  The others are good but Hi-Tek was DJ Hi-Tek on that first joint as opposed to being Dre pupil with a hint of Hi-Tek on the side on the other two projects.  Regardless the man is still a beast on the beats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

